ethical hacking

Different testing methodologies
Often people get confused with the following terms and use them interchangeably without understanding that although there are some aspects that overlap within these, there are also subtle differences that needs attention:

• Ethical hacking
• Penetration testing
• Vulnerability assessment
• Security audits

Ethical hacking
Very few people know that hacking is a misunderstood term; it means different things to different people and more often a hacker is thought of as a person sitting in a closed enclosure with no social life and with a malicious intent. Thus, the word ethical was prefixed to the term hacking. The term ethical hacking is used to refer to professionals who work to identify loopholes and vulnerabilities on systems, report it to the vendor or owner of the system, and also, at times, help them fix it. The tools and techniques used by an ethical hacker are similar to the ones used by a cracker or a Black Hat hacker, but the aim is different as it is used in a more professional way. Ethical hackers are also known as security researchers.

Penetration testing
This is a term that we will use very often and it is a subset of ethical hacking. Penetration testing is a more professional term used to describe what an ethical hacker does. If you are planning for a career in hacking, then you would often see job posting with the title penetration tester. Although penetration testing is a subset of ethical hacking, it differs in multiple ways. It’s a more streamlined way of identifying vulnerabilities in the systems and finding if the vulnerability is exploitable or not. Penetration testing is bound by a contract between the tester and owner of the systems to be tested. You need to define the scope of the test to identify the systems to be tested. The rules of engagement need to be defined, which decide the way in which the testing is to be done.

penetration

The limitations of penetration testing

Although penetration tests are recommended and should be conducted on a regular basis, there are certain limitations to it. The quality of the test and its results will directly depend on the skills of the testing team. Penetration tests cannot find all the vulnerabilities due to limitation of scope, limitation on access of penetration testers to the testing environment, and limitations of tools used by the tester. Following are some of the limitations of a penetration test :

Limitation of skills : As mentioned earlier, the success and quality of the test will directly depend on the skills and experience of the penetration testing team. Penetration tests can be classified into three broad categories: network, system, and web application penetration testing. You would not get the right results if you make a person skilled on network penetration testing work on a project that involves testing a web application. With the huge number of technologies deployed today on the Internet, it is hard to find a person skillful in all three. A tester may have in-depth knowledge of Apache Web servers but might encounter an IIS server for the first time. Past experience also play a significant role in the success of the test; mapping a low risk vulnerability to a system that has a high level of threat is a skill that is only acquired with experience.

Limitation of time : Often, penetration testing is a short-term project that has to be completed in a predefined time period. The testing team is required to produce results and identity vulnerabilities within that period. Attackers on the other hand, have much more time to work on their attacks and can plan them carefully over a longer period. Penetration testers also have to produce a report at the end of the test, describing the methodology, vulnerabilities identified, and an executive summary. Screenshots have to be taken at regular intervals, which are then added to the report. An attacker would not be writing any reports and can therefore dedicate more time to the actual attack.

Limitation of custom exploits : In some highly secure environments, normal pentesting frameworks and tools are of little use and it requires the team to think out of the box, such as creating a custom exploit and manually writing scripts to reach the target. Creating exploits is extremely time consuming and is also not part of the skillset of most penetration testers.

Writing custom exploit code would affect the overall budget and time of the test.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here